legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Harris CA2/3
Defendants and appellants, Alonzo Harris and Floyd Nelson, appealed their convictions for charges arising out of a series of robberies, attempted robberies and associated crimes. In an unpublished opinion filed on August 29, 2017, we affirmed the judgment as to Harris. As to Nelson, we modified the judgment, affirmed it as modified, and remanded to the trial court for resentencing.
Harris and Nelson petitioned for review of our decision. Among other things, they argued they were entitled to the benefit of newly enacted Senate Bill 620, which became effective on January 1, 2018, and gives trial courts discretion to strike certain firearm enhancements in the interest of justice. Our Supreme Court granted appellants’ petitions for review and transferred the matter back to this court with directions to vacate our decision and reconsider the cause in light of Senate Bill 620.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale