In re D.B. CA1/5
D.B. contends the juvenile court erred in sustaining allegations of a juvenile wardship petition that charged him with oral copulation by force (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (c)(2)(C)) and assault with intent to commit oral copulation (§ 220, subd. (a)(1)). He argues that the court erred in finding the offenses occurred in 2014 (when he was 14 years old) rather than in 2013 (when he was 13 years old), and that there was insufficient evidence to overcome the presumption that he did not understand the wrongfulness of his actions (§ 26). We will affirm.
Comments on In re D.B. CA1/5