Poulose v. Ford Motor Co. CA2/5
Plaintiff Joseph Poulose appeals from a judgment following a jury trial. Plaintiff sued defendants Ford Motor Company and Vista Ford in Woodland Hills, California (the dealership) for breach of the implied and express warranty under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code , § 1790 et seq.) (Song-Beverly). On September 9, 2016, the jury returned a special verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $5,000 restitution for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability (the implied warranty). Plaintiff contends the jury erred because it applied the wrong remedy for a breach of the implied warranty under Song-Beverly. Plaintiff also asserts the trial court erred by failing to answer a jury question during deliberation and not requiring the jury to re-deliberate to correct a purportedly insufficient verdict. We affirm.
Comments on Poulose v. Ford Motor Co. CA2/5