legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.O. CA5
Appellants D.A. and M.O. are the biological father and mother, respectively, of S.O. The juvenile court found the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq., did not apply, denied reunification services, and terminated parental rights. Father appeals, contending the matter must be conditionally reversed for the Kings County Human Services Agency (agency) to fully comply with the ICWA by taking affirmative steps to learn more about father’s potential Iroquois Nation heritage. Mother, who claimed no Indian ancestry, joins in the appeal.
We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale