legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Brandon CA4/2
While seated in front of a convenience store, defendant and appellant Rubien Earl Brandon had a fixed-blade knife on his person and a syringe for injecting methamphetamine in his backpack. Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of carrying a concealed dirk or dagger (Pen. Code, § 21310; count 1) and possessing an instrument for injecting controlled substances (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364; count 2). In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found true that defendant had suffered one prior strike conviction (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)) and two prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). Defendant was sentenced to a total term of four years in state prison. On appeal, defendant contends that section 21310, the statute that criminalizes carrying a concealed dirk or dagger, and section 16470, the statute that defines “dirk” and “dagger,” together are unconstitutionally overbroad. We reject this contention and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale