legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Robert G. CA5
On September 29, 2017, the juvenile court terminated the parental rights of Roberto G. (father) and G.C. (mother) to their two sons, Robert G. (11 years old) and M.G. (22 months old) at the conclusion of a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. On appeal, father, with mother joining, contends the juvenile court erred in denying his request for a bonding study and in summarily denying his petition pursuant to section 388 to either reinstate reunification services or to grant him custody with a family maintenance plan. Both mother and father contend the juvenile court erred in failing to apply the beneficial parent-child relationship exception in determining whether to terminate parental rights. We find no error and affirm the orders of the juvenile court.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale