Nielsen v. FCA US LLC CA1/5
Blake Edward Nielsen appeals from a judgment and post-judgment order denying him recovery for his attorney fees and costs in a “lemon law” action commenced under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.) (the Act). He contends the court erred in finding that he was not the prevailing party under the Act; respondent’s settlement offer pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 was invalid due to ambiguity and uncertainty; and the court erred in finding that his recovery at trial was less than the amount of the settlement offer. We will affirm.
Comments on Nielsen v. FCA US LLC CA1/5