legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Araujo CA4/1
A jury convicted Adam M. Araujo of assault with intent to commit a specified sex crime during the commission of a first degree burglary, first degree burglary, indecent exposure - unlawful entry, lewd conduct, prowling and peeking.
The court sentenced Araujo to life with the possibility of parole for count 1, the remaining felony counts were stayed under section 654 and the sentence for the misdemeanor counts was time served.
Araujo appeals challenging the conviction for count 2, contending count 2 is a lesser included offense (LIO) of count 1, and he also argues if we reverse count 2 we should remand the case to allow the court to reconsider its imposition of a $10,000 restitution fine. The People correctly concede count 2 must be reversed. They contend there is no reason to remand for reconsideration of the restitution fine. We agree with the People on both issues. Accordingly, we will reverse the conviction for count 2 and affirm the balance of the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale