P. v. Farag CA4/3
Appellant Michael Farag was convicted by jury of carrying a concealed dirk or dagger and possessing methamphetamine. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred by 1) denying his request for a mistrial after the jury may have been exposed to prejudicial information about him; 2) questioning the jurors about this issue in his absence; and 3) failing to give full and complete instructions on the weapons charge. Finding these contentions unmeritorious, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Farag CA4/3