legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Gavin G. CA1/3
J.Y. (Mother) appeals from a juvenile court order denying her visitation with her minor son, Gavin G. (Gavin). Mother contends there was no evidence or findings that her visits were detrimental to Gavin supporting such an order. We conclude the court’s denial of visitation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. When the court made the order, reunification efforts had been terminated after approximately 18 months of services. Mother had made no progress towards addressing her addiction, and a Welfare & Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing had been set. These factors, among others, indicate there was no likelihood that Mother’s loss of visitation affected the subsequent termination of her parental rights. Accordingly, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale