Thakar v. Smitray, Inc. CA2/4
This is the sixth appeal brought and maintained by plaintiff Chetan Thakar (who has represented himself throughout this litigation) against numerous defendants in New Jersey and California based upon an alleged conspiracy to deprive Thakar of employment and legal representation. All but one of the appeals were unsuccessful. In the other, we reversed the trial court’s order dismissing on demurrer all of the claims against defendant Robert Conti (respondent in this appeal), finding that some of the claims, while factually improbable, were legally adequate. Conti was the attorney for Smitray, Inc., S.D.P. Investments, Inc. (the Smitray corporate defendants), Dinu Dahyabhai Patel, and Nick Dahya (all of whom are collectively referred to as the Smitray defendants) in various actions Thakar filed against them, including the present action. In this appeal, we affirm the summary judgment in favor of Conti. We also affirm.
Comments on Thakar v. Smitray, Inc. CA2/4