legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Brown CA2/5
The jury found defendant and appellant Justin Dijon Brown guilty of felon in possession of a firearm in violation of Penal Code section 29800, subdivision (a)(1) in count 2, and found that the offense was committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang under section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(A). The trial court declared a mistrial as to count 1 (§ 211 [robbery]), in which it was also alleged that Brown personally used a firearm (§12022.53, subd. (b)), and that the crime was committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C)). In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found true the allegations that Brown had served three prior prison terms within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (b), had been convicted of a serious felony within the meaning of section 667, subdivision (a)(1), and had been convicted of a serious or violent felony within the meaning of the three strikes law (§§ 667, subds. (b)–(i), 1170, subds. (a)–(d)).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale