P. v. Soto CA4/3
Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas, and we appointed counsel to represent him. In conducting his analysis of potential appellate issues, appointed counsel informed us in his declaration that he consulted with a staff attorney at Appellate Defenders, Inc. Counsel then filed a brief pursuant to the procedures set forth in People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738. Counsel did not argue against defendant, but advised the court he was unable to find any issue to argue on defendant’s behalf. Defendant was given the opportunity to file written argument on his own behalf, but he has not done so.
We have examined the entire record and, like counsel, have not found an arguable issue on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the postjudgment order.
Comments on P. v. Soto CA4/3