P. v. Mairose CA6
Defendant Mark Alan Mairose was convicted of misdemeanor possession of an ingestion device (Health & Saf. Code § 11364, subd. (a)) and two counts of felony failure to appear while on bail (Pen. Code § 1320.5).
On appeal, Mairose’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) that raises no issue. We notified Mairose of his right to submit written argument on this own behalf within 30 days. The 30-day period has elapsed and we have not received written argument from Mairose.
Pursuant to Wende, we have reviewed the entire record and find that there is no arguable issue on appeal. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Mairose CA6