In re Michael G. CA5
Kristina C., mother of six-year-old Michael G., appeals the juvenile court’s findings and orders made at the six-month review hearing, where the juvenile court found that mother had been provided reasonable reunification services, adopted an updated case plan, and ordered continuation of mother’s services. On appeal, mother challenges the reasonable services finding and the updated case plan. She also challenges the juvenile court’s summary denial of her section 388 petition, by which she sought, inter alia, to terminate jurisdiction.
The crux of mother’s contentions, both below and on appeal, is that there is insufficient evidence to support the jurisdictional finding that she sought unnecessary and risky medical interventions for Michael, and it was unreasonable to require her to admit this in order to reunify with him.
Comments on In re Michael G. CA5