legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.P. CA4/3
J.P. appeals from the judgment entered after the juvenile court found true the allegations of a delinquency petition filed under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, charging him with one misdemeanor count of engaging in lewd conduct. (Pen. Code, § 647, subd. (a).) He contends incriminating statements he made to a police officer should have been suppressed because his implied waiver of his rights (Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda)), was not voluntary, intelligent, and knowing. We need not decide if the statements should have been suppressed because any error would be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the overwhelming evidence of his guilt. We affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale