P. v. Koziar
Defendant sentence for transportation of a controlled substance was enhanced by three prior drug convictions. Defendant argues that two of those convictions arose from the same set of facts, and he should therefore have been given only one enhancement for both to avoid dual punishment. Court agreed and therefore order the judgment modified accordingly. Defendant also argues an error was made calculating his custody credits. Court found that he is partly correct and order the judgment modified accordingly.
Comments on P. v. Koziar