P. v. Guerrero
Appellant was convicted of two counts of attempted premeditated murder based on his firing a single shot at two women during the course of a botched robbery. Relying on the fact he fired only one shot, he contends one of the counts must be reversed for insufficient evidence. Defendant also contends the court prejudicially erred in giving CALJIC No. 8.66.1, the so-called “kill zone” instruction. Court disagreed with his contentions and affirmed the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Guerrero