SP Investment Fund I, LLC v. Grossman CA2/4
SP Investment Fund I, LLC (SP) sued Ivan Grossman for breach of contract and conversion. A jury trial resulted in a verdict in favor of SP. The court entered a judgment in favor of SP that awarded prejudgment interest, but the space for the amount of prejudgment interest was left blank. SP moved to have the prejudgment interest amount inserted into the judgment, and also moved for attorney fees and costs. The court granted SP’s motions, and Grossman appealed.
Grossman asserts that the procedure by which SP requested that the court include the amount of prejudgment interest was improper, because it was tantamount to an untimely motion for new trial. We disagree; SP’s request that the court fill in the amount of prejudgment interest that had already been awarded did not require a substantive change in the judgment.
Comments on SP Investment Fund I, LLC v. Grossman CA2/4