Czternasty v. Vereker CA4/1
Les Czternasty, who is self-represented, appeals a judgment awarding him no damages in his personal injury action. Czternasty contends (1) without his knowledge, the special verdict form submitted to the jury was changed from the one he approved; (2) the jury engaged in guesswork in reaching its award; and (3) the judge who presided over the trial erred by receiving the verdict without requiring the jury to deliberate further. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on Czternasty v. Vereker CA4/1