legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.B. CA5
Appellant Charles B. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders denying his modification petition requesting reunification services and terminating parental rights over his now seven-year-old daughter, A.B. He contends he established the requisite showing of changed circumstances and best interest pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, subdivision (a)(1) to warrant an order for reunification services. He further contends the termination order was error because there was insufficient evidence A.B. was adoptable and the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to adoption (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)) applied. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale