Berglund v. Rogers CA2/4
Plaintiff Judy Berglund appeals the dismissal of her complaint against Ulara Rogers, alleging tort claims for extortion, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and interference with economic advantage. Berglund is married to Rogers’s former husband. Berglund alleged that Rogers sent her a letter threatening to pursue criminal charges against her in South Korea, under a Korean adultery statute, unless Berglund paid Rogers $700,000.
The trial court sustained the demurrer filed by Rogers without leave to amend. The court found that Berglund’s claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. On appeal, Berglund contends that she adequately alleged a continuing course of conduct and therefore that her lawsuit was timely. Alternatively, she argues the trial court erred in denying her leave to amend.
Comments on Berglund v. Rogers CA2/4