Sandoval v. Superior Court CA2/4
In the underlying arbitration proceeding, the arbitrator dismissed the claims asserted by Abel Sandoval and Jesus Nolasco, concluding that they failed to demand arbitration within the applicable limitations periods, as determined under the arbitration agreements and Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.12. Sandoval and Nolasco noticed an appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to vacate the dismissal, which is not an appealable order. We conclude that immediate review of the denial is appropriate and treat their appeal as a petition for writ of mandate, but deny the petition.
Comments on Sandoval v. Superior Court CA2/4