In re S.D. CA2/5
M.F. (Mother) appeals the juvenile court’s denial of her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition, which asked the juvenile court to reinstate previously terminated services to reunify with her son S.D. Mother contends the juvenile court erred in denying her petition without an evidentiary hearing because she made a prima facie showing of changed circumstances such that reinstituting services would be in S.D.’s best interest. The juvenile court has since terminated Mother’s parental rights over S.D., however, and Mother has not appealed that rights termination order. We consider whether there is any effective relief we can provide Mother in light of the unchallenged termination of her parental rights.
Comments on In re S.D. CA2/5