P. v. Sagar CA1/5
Anil Sagar appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of assault with a deadly weapon. He contends a sentence enhancement imposed for a prior prison term (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)) must be stricken, because an enhancement was also imposed for a serious felony (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)). Because the trial court stayed the section 667.5 enhancement, we will affirm.
Comments on P. v. Sagar CA1/5