legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Herman v. Gould CA2/1
Mark Gould appeals from the trial court’s grant of a domestic violence restraining order sought by his former girlfriend, respondent Erika Herman. Gould argues that the evidence of abuse was insufficient and that the court violated his right to due process by not allowing his minor daughters to testify. In the conclusion of his opening brief he also asks that the prohibition against his owning a firearm be reversed, but he makes no argument and cites no authority for that contention. We hold that there was substantial evidence of abuse, that Gould was not prejudiced by the exclusion of his daughters’ testimony, and that he has forfeited his challenge to the firearm prohibition. Accordingly, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale