Herman v. Gould CA2/1
Mark Gould appeals from the trial court’s grant of a domestic violence restraining order sought by his former girlfriend, respondent Erika Herman. Gould argues that the evidence of abuse was insufficient and that the court violated his right to due process by not allowing his minor daughters to testify. In the conclusion of his opening brief he also asks that the prohibition against his owning a firearm be reversed, but he makes no argument and cites no authority for that contention. We hold that there was substantial evidence of abuse, that Gould was not prejudiced by the exclusion of his daughters’ testimony, and that he has forfeited his challenge to the firearm prohibition. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on Herman v. Gould CA2/1