P. v. Orosco-Hernandez CA3
Defendant Vincent Gerald Orosco-Hernandez appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of second degree robbery, vandalism, and making a criminal threat. He contends insufficient evidence supports: (1) the verdict for making a criminal threat and (2) an order requiring him to pay $6,000 in attorney fees. He also requests the striking of interest included in a minute order, but not imposed by the court at rendition of judgment. The People concur the interest condition must be stricken. Both parties note the trial court’s failure to orally impose the restitution award to victim AM/PM.
We remand the case so the trial court may strike the condition of interest and exercise its discretion regarding the restitution award for AM/PM, but otherwise affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Orosco-Hernandez CA3