legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.B. CA6
In this dependency matter, Father appeals from the juvenile court’s order removing D.B. from his custody pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361, subdivision (c). Father asserts that the juvenile court erred in ordering removal in this case, because D.B. was not residing with him at the time the section 387 petition was filed. We find that the trial court erred in ordering removal pursuant to section 361, subdivision (c), but that the error was harmless. We will affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale