In re K.J. CA3
A.J., mother of the minors, appeals from the juvenile court’s orders terminating dependency jurisdiction and setting visitation. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.3 & 395.) Mother contends (1) the juvenile court erred in terminating dependency jurisdiction while exceptional circumstances existed to continue jurisdiction, (2) the juvenile court abused its discretion by improperly delegating issues related to visitation to the legal guardian, and (3) the Sacramento County Department of Child, Family and Adult Services (Department) failed to file written orders reflecting the juvenile court’s orders at the postpermanency review hearing. Finding no error, we will affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
Comments on In re K.J. CA3