In re Wendy G. CA5
Appellant Carlos R. (father) challenges the juvenile court’s denial of reunification services to him. He contends the juvenile court erred when it deemed him an alleged father, instead of a presumed father, and erred in denying reunification services even after elevating him to presumed father status. We agree the juvenile court erred and the error was prejudicial. We reverse.
Comments on In re Wendy G. CA5