P. v. Strand CA4/3
Christopher Allen Strand appeals from a 76-years-to-life sentence following his convictions on three sex offenses. He contends the trial court prejudicially erred by sustaining the prosecution’s objection to questions his attorney asked two defense witnesses. He further claims the prosecutor’s misconduct in closing and rebuttal arguments impermissibly reduced the prosecution’s burden of proof. For the reasons stated below, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Strand CA4/3