legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Kane v. Schear, Inc. CA4/3
Appellants Jason Kane and Christopher Simrak (collectively, plaintiffs) sued their former employer respondent Schear, Inc. (Schear), alleging various employment-related causes of action. Following trial, a jury rendered special verdicts in plaintiffs’ favor on most of their claims. Over plaintiffs’ objections, the trial court entered Schear’s proposed judgment as the final judgment and denied their motion to set aside and vacate the judgment, and enter an amended judgment consistent with the jury’s special verdicts. For the reasons set forth below, we agree with plaintiffs the judgment was not supported by the jury’s special verdicts or the uncontroverted facts. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale