legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Nina H. v. Marcus M. CA2/3
This family law proceeding began 10 years ago when appellant Nina H. filed a petition against respondent Marcus M. to establish his parental relationship over their son. The parties agreed to custody and visitation, but disputed the amount of child support. The issue of child support was tried more than five years later on December 19, 2013. The trial court announced its findings at the end of the trial that day and ordered respondent to pay appellant child support arrearages from October 2011 through December 2013 and prospective child support beginning January 2014, and to pay appellant’s attorney $15,000 in attorney fees as a sanction. The trial court ordered appellant to submit a judgment within 90 days, but made its orders effective immediately. Less than three months later, respondent filed a “request for order” to modify the amounts of child support and attorney fees the trial court had ordered on the ground the orders were based on an incorrect calculation of his inc

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale