Sekel v. Borsuk CA4/2
Plaintiff and appellant, Jeff Sekel, appeals a judgment of dismissal after the trial court granted a motion to quash service of summons brought by nonresident defendants and respondents Lynne Y. Borsuk (Borsuk) and her law firm, Lynne Y. Borsuk, P.C. (collectively defendants). Sekel contends the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion to quash on the ground it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants. Sekel argues defendants consented to jurisdiction in California by making a general appearance in the action. Sekel also contends the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion to quash, because the motion was untimely. Sekel alternatively argues defendants had minimum contacts with California sufficient to support personal jurisdiction over defendants.
Comments on Sekel v. Borsuk CA4/2