P. v. Castillo CA5
Appellant Ruben Castillo argues only that his conviction for receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a)), based upon his possession of the items stolen during a burglary for which he was convicted (§§ 459 & 460), must be reversed. The People concede and we agree. We reverse the conviction for receiving stolen property, and affirm the judgment in all other respects.
Comments on P. v. Castillo CA5