legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Adrian R.
Appellant, mother, lost custody of her two-year old son, due to her substance abuse and emotional problems.
Mother appeals the order terminating her parental rights. She contends that the juvenile court erred when it found that mother had failed to establish the parental relationship exception in Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision, (c)(1)(A). She also contends, for the first time on appeal, that because the juvenile court had a “preconceived” preference for adoption as a permanent plan for child, she was prevented from asserting the section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(D), exception and, therefore, denied procedural due process. Court Affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale