legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Matthew H. CA2/4
Appellant Alexander J. and N.A. (Mother) have two children, a son, Matthew H., and a daughter, “M.H.” Mother has three other young daughters, “M.A.,” “J.A.” and “G.A.” The juvenile court asserted jurisdiction over Matthew and M.H. under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a) (serious physical harm), (b) (failure to protect), (d) (sexual abuse), and (j) (abuse of sibling). The jurisdictional findings were based on appellant’s alcohol abuse, multiple instances of domestic violence between appellant and Mother in which appellant physically attacked Mother, and appellant’s sexual abuse of Mother’s daughter, M.A. On appeal, appellant contests the finding that his children are at risk of sexual abuse as the result of his molestation of M.A., and the dispositional requirement that he participate in sexual abuse counseling for perpetrators. Finding no error, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale