Huang v. Sayer CA2/8
Defendant Michael Sayer appeals from an order denying his special motion to strike Wang Shiu Hsia Huang and Tuu Cherng Hwang’s (together, Plaintiffs) complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16). Sayer, who is an attorney, asserts the court erred in denying his motion because Plaintiffs’ claims are premised on his protected activities of advising and instructing a client. He also contends Plaintiffs’ conspiracy cause of action is moot. We affirm the order.
Comments on Huang v. Sayer CA2/8