P. v. Ruiz CA6
After a jury trial, defendant Alonso Ruiz was found guilty of making criminal threats and actively participating in a criminal street gang. On appeal, he contends that the trial court violated the Sixth Amendment by admitting testimonial hearsay statements offered by the prosecution’s gang expert, contrary to People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665 (Sanchez). We agree that error occurred, but it was not prejudicial. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Ruiz CA6