legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Michael M. v. Superior Court CA1/4
In this juvenile writ proceeding, Michael M. (father) seeks extraordinary relief from the juvenile court order declining to provide him with reunification services and setting a permanency planning hearing with respect to his young daughter, Z.M. (born August 2017). Specifically, father argues that the juvenile court erred in denying him reunification services pursuant to subdivisions (b)(10) and (b)(13) of section 361.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and failed to make any explicit findings with respect to subdivision (b)(16) bypass. Father also avers that offering reunification services to him would have been in the minor’s best interests. Although father correctly highlights numerous procedural errors in the juvenile court’s bypass determinations, we conclude that the court’s underlying decision in this case to forgo reunification efforts with father was amply supported by the evidence. We therefore deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale