P. v. Thomas CA2/7
Annette Lashay Thomas appeals from the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found her guilty of robbery, carjacking and kidnapping to commit robbery, contending the prosecutor committed misconduct by arguing facts not in evidence, her counsel provided constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to object to those comments and the court prejudicially erred by failing to instruct on simple kidnapping as a lesser included offense of kidnapping to commit robbery and instructing on flight as evidence of a consciousness of guilt. She also argues the court erred in separately sentencing her for both carjacking and kidnapping to commit robbery. We modify the judgment to correct a sentencing error and, as modified, affirm.
Comments on P. v. Thomas CA2/7