legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Pledger CA2/7
Defendant James L. Pledger appeals from an order denying his petition under Proposition 36, the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (Pen. Code, § 1170.126), for recall of his sentence imposed for conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon. Pledger contends a defendant is ineligible for resentencing under Proposition 36 for being “armed with a firearm” during the commission of an offense only if the arming is tethered to an offense other than possession of a firearm by a felon. He also contends a defendant is disqualified from resentencing only where there is a “facilitative nexus” between his possession of a firearm and the underlying offense. Finally, Pledger contends the superior court erred in requiring the prosecutor to prove Pledger’s ineligibility for resentencing under Proposition 36 by a preponderance of the evidence, instead of beyond a reasonable doubt.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale