legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.J. CA2/7
At a 12-month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (f)), the juvenile court found substantial risk to then-nine-year-old S.J. if she were returned to the custody of her mother, Tamara J. The court found Tamara in partial compliance with her case plan and ordered additional reunification services for her. At the 18-month review hearing (§ 366.22), the juvenile court terminated Tamara’s reunification services and set a hearing for the selection and implementation of a permanent plan for S.J. (§ 366.26). Tamara filed an appeal from the findings and order made at the 12-month review hearing and a petition for extraordinary writ challenging the court’s rulings at the 18-month review hearing.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale