In re G.S. CA2/7
Y.G. (Mother) and Omar S. (Father) appeal from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings that Father had sexually abused their nine-year-old daughter G.S. in 2012, and Mother failed to protect G.S. by allowing Father to reside in the home in violation of a juvenile court custody order, which permitted only monitored visits for Father. The parents contend the evidence is insufficient to support the jurisdictional findings under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b)(1) and (d). Mother also asserts the juvenile court abused its discretion by ordering her to attend sexual abuse awareness counseling for a second time.
Comments on In re G.S. CA2/7