legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gruwell CA3
Defendant Samantha Dee Gruwell pled no contest to unlawfully discharging a .22-caliber rifle in a grossly negligent manner. She was granted probation. On appeal, she challenges the condition of probation authorizing the warrantless search of “any data storage device, including cellular telephones and computers,” and requiring her to provide any passwords or unlock codes to allow for their inspection (special condition 65). Specifically, she argues that special condition 65 violates People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481, and is constitutionally overbroad in violation of her Fourth Amendment rights. She further contends the condition requiring her to maintain a residence as approved by the probation officer (general condition 4) and the condition requiring her to obtain written permission from her probation officer before leaving the state (general condition 6) are both overbroad in violation of her constitutional right to travel.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale