In re K.K. CA4/3
Minors K.K. and C.K. appeal from the juvenile court’s decision to apply the sibling relationship exception to the termination of parental rights, and order legal guardianship as the minors’ permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(v); all further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code unless otherwise stated.)
K.K. and C.K. argue there is insufficient evidence to support the court’s finding adoption would substantially interfere with their relationship to their elder brother, Ch.K., and that the juvenile court abused its discretion when it declined to order adoption as the permanent plan. County counsel agrees with K.K. and C.K. On the other hand, Ch.K. and the minors’ parents seek to affirm the court’s findings and order.
Comments on In re K.K. CA4/3