P. v. Bonner CA3
Defendant Brook Thomas Bonner challenges his burglary conviction (Pen. Code, § 459), arguing the trial court erred in excluding testimony from his grandparents that they had previously seen him act paranoid and worry about nonexistent dangers. Defendant also argues the trial court erred in instructing the jury that the defense of mistake of fact requires that a defendant’s belief in the mistaken fact be reasonable. We will affirm.
Comments on P. v. Bonner CA3