legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re P.G. CA4/2
S.G. (Father) is the father of five-year-old son W.G., and one-year-old daughter P.G. The children were removed from parental custody after then seven-week-old P.G. sustained a non-accidental fractured femur and bruising to her face. The mothers were offered reunification services. However, the juvenile court denied Father reunification services under Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b)(6), after determining it was not in the children’s best interest to offer him services. Father challenges the court’s findings and orders denying him services, contending the evidence demonstrated reunification services were in the children’s best interest. For the reasons explained below, we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale