P. v. Servin CA6
A jury found defendant guilty of two counts of forcible rape. Defendant challenges the upper term imposed on the principal count, arguing that his attorney rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to the court’s dual use of facts both to support consecutive sentences and the aggravated term. Finding no deficient performance or prejudice from the lack of an objection, we will affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Servin CA6