legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Moreno CA4/1
Defendant Jack Moreno pled no contest to four felony counts based on his sexual activities with a minor under the age of 14. Relying on a verbal misstatement by the trial judge in referencing the correct statutory subdivision during the plea colloquy, Moreno now argues that he actually pled to a misdemeanor in count 3. But as we read the record, despite the judge's misstatement Moreno was reasonably aware at all times that he was pleading to a felony in count 3. Under these circumstances, his felony conviction does not violate due process and we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale